Search found 10 matches
- Tue Aug 27, 2024 3:09 pm
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Steel/Alloy ejection assembly ? Blackhawk
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1223
Re: Steel/Alloy ejection assembly ? Blackhawk
Thank You!!
- Mon Aug 26, 2024 12:45 pm
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Steel/Alloy ejection assembly ? Blackhawk
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1223
Re: Steel/Alloy ejection assembly ? Blackhawk
Well it’s in like new condition and I was thinking of using it. But I am working on a 1966 .41 mag Blackhawk. We discussed some correct base pins and I have found a correct one. I see what you about mean about getting one with out the pin. Seems you tube has pulled all their videos on the old models...
- Sun Aug 25, 2024 8:14 pm
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Steel/Alloy ejection assembly ? Blackhawk
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1223
Steel/Alloy ejection assembly ? Blackhawk
I ran across a steel assembly are they after market? What models offered them? I assume they are preferred to alloy?
- Sat Aug 24, 2024 1:56 pm
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Ruger safety conversion question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2437
Re: Ruger safety conversion question
Did not know that—you dont see them for sale often.
- Wed Aug 21, 2024 7:50 pm
- Forum: Wanted To Buy
- Topic: Parts to return ‘66 BlackHawk .41Mag to as shipped
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1511
Re: Parts to return ‘66 BlackHawk .41Mag to as shipped
I think I have it covered now-Thanks for your Help!!!!
- Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:58 pm
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Ruger safety conversion question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2437
Re: Ruger safety conversion question
Thanks All,
Okay got some parts coming. So the base pin, not ejector housing. Well I may have two sets now. One will have an ejector housing. I also will have some extra screws and such. Thats fine. Also studied up on the schematics.
I have been looking at how nice those brass frames look.
Chinook 3
Okay got some parts coming. So the base pin, not ejector housing. Well I may have two sets now. One will have an ejector housing. I also will have some extra screws and such. Thats fine. Also studied up on the schematics.
I have been looking at how nice those brass frames look.
Chinook 3
- Thu Aug 08, 2024 11:32 am
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Ruger safety conversion question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2437
Re: Ruger safety conversion question
That is just what I wanted to know. I think I am capable to do it - just need a little encouragement.I am in the process of acquiring the parts.
Thank You!!
Thank You!!
- Thu Aug 08, 2024 9:33 am
- Forum: Single Actions, 1953-1973
- Topic: Ruger safety conversion question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2437
Ruger safety conversion question
Looking to restore an OM Blackhawk in .41 mag. What parts are needed to restore back to “as shipped” from Ruger? Do you need more than the hammer and trigger? How difficult is it to install them?
Thanks
Thanks
- Wed Aug 07, 2024 6:07 am
- Forum: Wanted To Buy
- Topic: Parts to return ‘66 BlackHawk .41Mag to as shipped
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1511
- Tue Aug 06, 2024 3:20 pm
- Forum: Wanted To Buy
- Topic: Parts to return ‘66 BlackHawk .41Mag to as shipped
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1511
Parts to return ‘66 BlackHawk .41Mag to as shipped
As title says looking to restore my OM .41 Mag to original configuration. I need the internals and would also like a set grip panels - walnut - black eagle - blued screw etc.
THANK YOU!!!!
THANK YOU!!!!